
Big Money and the Right to Free Speech
Host:
Produced by:
An attack film called Hillary: The Movie is at the heart of a case that could change the way political campaigns have been financed for more than 100 years. We hear about today's extraordinary session of the US Supreme Court, the first for the new Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Also, the capture of a New York Times Reporter illustrates the escalating danger in Afghanistan. On Reporter's Notebook, can the US afford NASA's plans to go back to the Moon and on to Mars? What about private enterprise?
Making News
Capture of New York Times Reporter Illustrates Danger in Afghanistan ()
There's evidence today that Afghanistan is getting more dangerous for reporters. A British commando raid has rescued Stephen Farrell of the New York Times, who was seized on Saturday. But one of the commandos was killed, along with an Afghan woman and Farrell's interpreter, Sultan Munadi. Bob Dietz is Asia Program Coordinator for the Committee to Protect Journalists.
Guests:
- Bob Dietz: Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists
Main Topic
Big Money and the Right to Free Speech ()
In 1907, trust-busting President Teddy Roosevelt persuaded Congress to ban corporations from contributing to political campaigns. Today, three weeks before its next session is scheduled to open -- with Justice Sonia Sotomayor on the bench for the first time, the US Supreme Court heard a case that could reverse more than 100 years of finance laws that now cover unions as well as corporations. Last year, the Federal Elections Commission banned the broadcast of the video Hillary: The Movie because it was funded by a corporation. Today's unusual meeting was called for arguments on whether the ban on corporate contributions violates the constitutional right to free speech. The ACLU and the National Rifle Association advocate letting them spend, in the interests of unlimited free speech. Democrat Russ Feingold and Republican John McCain warn that a flood of money will drown the voices of ordinary citizens.
Guests:
- Joan Biskupic: Legal Affairs Correspondent, USA Today
- Bradley Smith: Chairman, Center for Competitive Politics
- Rick Hasen: Professor of Law, Loyola Law School , @rickhasen
- Dave Levinthal: Communications Director, Center for Responsive Politics, @davelevinthal
Links:
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Supreme Court on (1990)
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, Supreme Court on (2003)
- Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 (McCain-Feingold)
- Biskukpic's article on the court hearing Citizens United case
- Smith's 'Unfree Speech: The Folly of Campaign Finance Reform'
- Hasen's post on the argument in Citizens United
- Capital Eye on today's Supreme Court hearing of Citizens United case
Reporter's Notebook
Space Panel Finds It Too Costly to Send Men to the Moon, Mars ()
NASA has big plans to send humans back to the Moon and Mars, but lacks the money to meet its goals, according to a blue-ribbon committee formed to advise President Obama. The President appointed former Lockheed Martin Chairman Norman Augustine to head the review of America's space program. His Human Space Flight Plans Committee has released its executive summary, which concludes that NASA is on an "unsustainable trajectory." Astronomer Jonathan McDowell is with the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Guests:
- Jonathan McDowell: Astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, @planet4589
Engage & Discuss
Further the conversation with your thoughts and comments. Agree, disagree, present a different perspective -- engage.
For information and guidelines click: Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Please note, comments are moderated. KCRW reserves the right to edit and or remove posts deemed off-topic, abusive or not in accordance with KCRW's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY