Listen Live
Donate
 on air
Schedule

KCRW

Read & Explore

  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Events

Listen

  • Live Radio
  • Music
  • Podcasts
  • Full Schedule

Information

  • About
  • Careers
  • Help / FAQ
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

Support

  • Become a Member
  • Become a VIP
  • Ways to Give
  • Shop
  • Member Perks

Become a Member

Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

DonateGive Monthly

Copyright 2026 KCRW. All rights reserved.

Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
Cookie Policy
|FCC Public Files

Deja-blue: Another year without the Dodgers on TV?

L.A. baseball fans could be in for another blue bummer this year. Far from being resolved in the offseason, the dispute that’s kept Dodgers games out of about 70 percent…

  • Share
By Darrell Satzman • Jan 16, 2015 • 1 min read

L.A. baseball fans could be in for another blue bummer this year.

Far from being resolved in the offseason, the dispute that’s kept Dodgers games out of about 70 percent of the region’s homes has become increasingly tangled.

Dodgers Chairman Mark Walter says there have been no new negotiations to end the pricing tiff between Time Warner Cable and other TV providers. Time Warner owns the Dodgers channel, which is called SportsNet L.A.

The impasse has become more complicated for reasons that have nothing to do with baseball. Time Warner is awaiting government approval for a merger with Comcast. At the same time, AT&T is trying to merge with DirecTV.

The Federal Communications Commission is supposed to rule on the Time Warner-Concast deal by the end of March – a week before the new baseball season starts. But the FCC has already delayed the process and there’s no guarantee that it won’t again. Meanwhile, federal law doesn’t allow a company to involve itself in the business of a merger partner before the merger is approved.

Time Warner is reportedly asking about $4.50 per subscriber for SportNet L.A., which would make it one of the most expensive non-premium channels. DirecTV, for one, says its opposition to that price hasn’t changed.

  • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

    Darrell Satzman

    Producer

    Arts & Culture StoriesSports