Listen Live
Donate
 on air
    Schedule

    KCRW

    Read & Explore

    • News
    • Entertainment
    • Food
    • Culture
    • Events

    Listen

    • Live Radio
    • Music
    • Podcasts
    • Full Schedule

    Information

    • About
    • Careers
    • Help / FAQ
    • Newsletters
    • Contact

    Support

    • Become a Member
    • Become a VIP
    • Ways to Give
    • Shop
    • Member Perks

    Become a Member

    Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

    DonateGive Monthly

    Copyright 2026 KCRW. All rights reserved.

    Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
    Cookie Policy
    |FCC Public Files|

    Back to Art Talk

    Art Talk

    Stupefying Prices/Priceless Exhibition

    By my nature I'm not a pessimist but last week, reading about the sale of mid-century paintings--one by Jasper Johns and the other by Willem de Kooning--for $143.5 million made me rather sad; not for David Geffen who sold them for an astonishing profit and definitely not for the two hedge fund billionaires who bought them. It made me sad because of the insanity of this whole transaction...

    • rss
    Download MP3
    • Share
    By Edward Goldman • Oct 18, 2006 • 4m Listen

    By my nature I'm not a pessimist but last week, reading about

    the sale of mid-century paintings--one by

    Jasper Johns and the other by

    Willem de Kooning--for $143.5 million made me rather sad; not for

    David Geffen who sold them for an astonishing profit and definitely not for the two hedge fund billionaires who bought them. It made me sad because of the insanity of this whole transaction. Two years ago, when the

    sale of an early Picasso painting broke the $100 million mark it felt as if the market had reached its peak, that there was no room to climb higher. Then

    Ronald Lauder snapped up the mesmerizing portrait of Adele by

    Gustav Klimt for $135 million. The extremely high prices for these paintings could be partially explained by their absence from the market for 50 years in the case of the Picasso and 70 years for the Klimt. The previous history of the ownership of these paintings is quite remarkable as well: the Picasso belonged to the

    Whitney family and the Klimt was owned--as it turned out illegally--by the

    Belvedere Gallery in Vienna.

    Meanwhile, the Johns and de Kooning canvases have been bought and sold numerous times in the last fifty years indicating to me that their owners loved and knew good art but they loved money even more. Gone are the days when collectors were expected to live with their art as well as with their spouses until "death do them part." There is speculation that Mr. Geffen might use his windfall to buy the Los Angeles Times which has a troubled relationship with its owner, the Tribune Company. Let's hope that there will be some loose change left for him to donate to his namesake, the Geffen Contemporary, the cavernous space in Little Tokyo that MOCA owns but rarely uses these days; it lacks climate and humidity controls required by today's museums and it would take about five million dollars to bring this space up to museum standards. Mr. Geffen, are you listening?

    And while we are talking about museum standards... the small and feisty Santa Monica Museum of Art in Bergamot Station has raised the bar with its ambitious current exhibition juxtaposing figurative paintings by visionary American artist, Philip Guston (1913-1980) and Italian painter Giorgio de Chirico (1888-1978), the precursor of Surrealism. It took four years to negotiate and obtain all the necessary loans from various museums and private collections for this remarkable exhibition that illustrates a fascinating moment in American cultural history. In the early 1930's, while living in Los Angeles, young Guston for the first time was exposed to European modern art in the house of Louise and Walter Arensberg, one of the most adventurous American collectors of their time.

    According to the artist's own words, the paintings by de Chirico profoundly affected the course of Guston's art for the next fifty years. It's intriguing to observe the young and impressionable American artist at first working under the spell of the European master: the same dark palette as well as an emphasis on monumental human figures thrust into a moody atmosphere of elaborately constructed deep spaces. However, the real payoff for Guston happens many years later when in the late-60's and 70's, he startles the public with paintings dominated by hooded Ku Klux Klan figures and severed body parts. This grotesque imagery painted in a cartoonish manner has an uneasy mixture of melancholy and tragedy. But the real miracle is the impossible balance that the artist achieves between the violence of his images and the delicate palette of powdery pinks and blues that lingers with you long after you have turned away. Even now, almost forty years after they were painted, these late works by Philip Guston have the unsettling ability to slap you in the face while caressing you at the same time.

    Enigma Variations: Philip Guston and Giorgio de Chirico

    Santa Monica Museum of Art

    Bergamot Station G1

    2525 Michigan Ave

    Santa Monica, Ca 90404

    tel: 310-586-6488

    On view until November 25

    • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

      Edward Goldman

      Host, Art Talk

      CultureArts
    Back to Art Talk