Listen Live
Donate
 on air
Schedule

KCRW

Read & Explore

  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Events

Listen

  • Live Radio
  • Music
  • Podcasts
  • Full Schedule

Information

  • About
  • Careers
  • Help / FAQ
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

Support

  • Become a Member
  • Become a VIP
  • Ways to Give
  • Shop
  • Member Perks

Become a Member

Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

DonateGive Monthly

Copyright 2025 KCRW. All rights reserved.

Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
Cookie Policy
|FCC Public Files

Back to To the Point

To the Point

Election 2000: Lessons Learned

Election 2000 proved that our voting system needs repair. Computers may be less problematic than chads, but high technology frightens many. So how do we balance the need and prospects for an accurate technology that's foolproof - and tamper-proof -- with the costs? How do we make it acceptable to all political circles? We get answers from the former and incoming chairs of the Federal Election Commission, Congressman Peter Defazio (D-OR), other state and local officials, and a Nobel Prize winner! Newsmaker: World Reaction to Bush Presidency - The international press has expressed little response to Bush's election victory. Most reaction has been relief that it's finally over, and a sense that US superiority has been undercut. June Thomas surveys international papers for the on-line magazine Slate. Reporter's Notebook: Contraception Coverage - A federal commission has charged that insurance plans discriminate against women by paying for Viagra while refusing to pay for birth control pills. Employers say it's just too expensive. Kate Sullivan is director of healthcare policy for the US Chamber of Commerce.

  • rss
  • Share
By Warren Olney • Dec 15, 2000 • 1 min read

Election 2000 proved that our voting system needs repair. Computers may be less problematic than chads, but high technology frightens many. So how do we balance the need and prospects for an accurate technology that's foolproof - and tamper-proof -- with the costs? How do we make it acceptable to all political circles? We get answers from the former and incoming chairs of the Federal Election Commission, Congressman Peter Defazio (D-OR), other state and local officials, and a Nobel Prize winner!

  • Newsmaker:

    World Reaction to Bush Presidency - The international press has expressed little response to Bush's election victory. Most reaction has been relief that it's finally over, and a sense that US superiority has been undercut. June Thomas surveys international papers for the on-line magazine

    Slate.

  • Reporter's Notebook:

    Contraception Coverage - A federal commission has charged that insurance plans discriminate against women by paying for Viagra while refusing to pay for birth control pills. Employers say it's just too expensive. Kate Sullivan is director of healthcare policy for the US Chamber of Commerce.

June Thomas' columns

Cal Tech-MIT Project

Rep. Peter DeFazio

Federal Election Commission

National Association of Secretaries of State

  • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

    Warren Olney

    former KCRW broadcaster

    NewsNationalPolitics
Back to To the Point