Listen Live
Donate
 on air
Schedule

KCRW

Read & Explore

  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Events

Listen

  • Live Radio
  • Music
  • Podcasts
  • Full Schedule

Information

  • About
  • Careers
  • Help / FAQ
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

Support

  • Become a Member
  • Become a VIP
  • Ways to Give
  • Shop
  • Member Perks

Become a Member

Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

DonateGive Monthly

Copyright 2025 KCRW. All rights reserved.

Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
Cookie Policy
|FCC Public Files

Back to To the Point

To the Point

Presidential Power in Wartime

In today's final round of questions, Senate Democrats pressed Judge Samuel Alito about presidential power, especially in wartime. Torture, domestic spying and the war in Iraq itself raise constitutional issues that could find their way to the US Supreme Court. One issue that hasn't been raised--but which has become part of the public debate--is the power to declare war itself. Does the Constitution really mean that only Congress can declare war or can the President do what he wants to protect the country? Can a President sign a law, but then mitigate its effects by declaring that he intends to enforce it selectively? We'll hear conflicting answers to those and other questions from legal experts, political scientists and a former member of the Reagan and Bush, Sr. Justice Departments.Making News: Hakim Warns Sunni Arabs on Changes to ConstitutionIraqi Sunnis participated in last month's elections in part because of promises that the new parliament could amend the constitution. Yesterday, Iraq's most powerful Shiite leader rejected such change, a call that top Sunnis say could divide the country. Juan Cole is Professor of Modern Middle East History at the University of Michigan and runs the authoritative website, JuanCole.com.Reporter's Notebook: General in Abu Ghraib Scandal Refuses to Implicate HimselfSince the revelations of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, seven low-ranking soldiers have taken most of the blame, but their lawyers claim they were following orders. Now Major General Geoffrey Miller, who established procedures at the Baghdad prison has declined to testify in the trial of a trainer whose dogs were used to frighten prisoners, invoking his right not to incriminate himself. Josh White reported the story in today's Washington Post.

  • rss
  • Share
By Warren Olney • Jan 12, 2006 • 1h 0m Listen

In today's final round of questions, Senate Democrats pressed Judge Samuel Alito about presidential power, especially in wartime. Torture, domestic spying and the war in Iraq itself raise constitutional issues that could find their way to the US Supreme Court. One issue that hasn't been raised--but which has become part of the public debate--is the power to declare war itself. Does the Constitution really mean that only Congress can declare war or can the President do what he wants to protect the country? Can a President sign a law, but then mitigate its effects by declaring that he intends to enforce it selectively? We'll hear conflicting answers to those and other questions from legal experts, political scientists and a former member of the Reagan and Bush, Sr. Justice Departments.

  • Making News:

    Hakim Warns Sunni Arabs on Changes to Constitution

    Iraqi Sunnis participated in last month's elections in part because of promises that the new parliament could amend the constitution. Yesterday, Iraq's most powerful Shiite leader rejected such change, a call that top Sunnis say could divide the country. Juan Cole is Professor of Modern Middle East History at the University of Michigan and runs the authoritative website, JuanCole.com.

  • Reporter's Notebook:

    General in Abu Ghraib Scandal Refuses to Implicate Himself

    Since the revelations of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, seven low-ranking soldiers have taken most of the blame, but their lawyers claim they were following orders. Now Major General Geoffrey Miller, who established procedures at the Baghdad prison has declined to testify in the trial of a trainer whose dogs were used to frighten prisoners, invoking his right not to incriminate himself. Josh White reported the story in today's Washington Post.

International Herald Tribune article on Hakim's threat

Aljazeera on Hakim's declaration that Sunnis must be represented regardless of election results

Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)

Reuters on Padilla's not guilty plea in US terror charges

Rumsfeld v Padilla, US Supreme Court on (2004)

President Bush on torture ban, Boston Glove on

Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

White's article on general's refusal to incriminate himself in Iraq abuse cases

  • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

    Warren Olney

    former KCRW broadcaster

    NewsNationalPolitics
Back to To the Point