Listen Live
Donate
 on air
    Schedule

    KCRW

    Read & Explore

    • News
    • Entertainment
    • Food
    • Culture
    • Events

    Listen

    • Live Radio
    • Music
    • Podcasts
    • Full Schedule

    Information

    • About
    • Careers
    • Help / FAQ
    • Newsletters
    • Contact

    Support

    • Become a Member
    • Become a VIP
    • Ways to Give
    • Shop
    • Member Perks

    Become a Member

    Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

    DonateGive Monthly

    Copyright 2026 KCRW. All rights reserved.

    Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
    Cookie Policy
    |FCC Public Files|

    Back to To the Point

    To the Point

    Presidential Power in Wartime

    In today's final round of questions, Senate Democrats pressed Judge Samuel Alito about presidential power, especially in wartime. Torture, domestic spying and the war in Iraq itself raise constitutional issues that could find their way to the US Supreme Court. One issue that hasn't been raised--but which has become part of the public debate--is the power to declare war itself. Does the Constitution really mean that only Congress can declare war or can the President do what he wants to protect the country? Can a President sign a law, but then mitigate its effects by declaring that he intends to enforce it selectively? We'll hear conflicting answers to those and other questions from legal experts, political scientists and a former member of the Reagan and Bush, Sr. Justice Departments.Making News: Hakim Warns Sunni Arabs on Changes to ConstitutionIraqi Sunnis participated in last month's elections in part because of promises that the new parliament could amend the constitution. Yesterday, Iraq's most powerful Shiite leader rejected such change, a call that top Sunnis say could divide the country. Juan Cole is Professor of Modern Middle East History at the University of Michigan and runs the authoritative website, JuanCole.com.Reporter's Notebook: General in Abu Ghraib Scandal Refuses to Implicate HimselfSince the revelations of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, seven low-ranking soldiers have taken most of the blame, but their lawyers claim they were following orders. Now Major General Geoffrey Miller, who established procedures at the Baghdad prison has declined to testify in the trial of a trainer whose dogs were used to frighten prisoners, invoking his right not to incriminate himself. Josh White reported the story in today's Washington Post.

    • rss
    • Share
    By Warren Olney • Jan 12, 2006 • 1h 0m Listen

    In today's final round of questions, Senate Democrats pressed Judge Samuel Alito about presidential power, especially in wartime. Torture, domestic spying and the war in Iraq itself raise constitutional issues that could find their way to the US Supreme Court. One issue that hasn't been raised--but which has become part of the public debate--is the power to declare war itself. Does the Constitution really mean that only Congress can declare war or can the President do what he wants to protect the country? Can a President sign a law, but then mitigate its effects by declaring that he intends to enforce it selectively? We'll hear conflicting answers to those and other questions from legal experts, political scientists and a former member of the Reagan and Bush, Sr. Justice Departments.

    • Making News:

      Hakim Warns Sunni Arabs on Changes to Constitution

      Iraqi Sunnis participated in last month's elections in part because of promises that the new parliament could amend the constitution. Yesterday, Iraq's most powerful Shiite leader rejected such change, a call that top Sunnis say could divide the country. Juan Cole is Professor of Modern Middle East History at the University of Michigan and runs the authoritative website, JuanCole.com.

    • Reporter's Notebook:

      General in Abu Ghraib Scandal Refuses to Implicate Himself

      Since the revelations of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, seven low-ranking soldiers have taken most of the blame, but their lawyers claim they were following orders. Now Major General Geoffrey Miller, who established procedures at the Baghdad prison has declined to testify in the trial of a trainer whose dogs were used to frighten prisoners, invoking his right not to incriminate himself. Josh White reported the story in today's Washington Post.

    International Herald Tribune article on Hakim's threat

    Aljazeera on Hakim's declaration that Sunnis must be represented regardless of election results

    Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito

    Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)

    Reuters on Padilla's not guilty plea in US terror charges

    Rumsfeld v Padilla, US Supreme Court on (2004)

    President Bush on torture ban, Boston Glove on

    Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

    White's article on general's refusal to incriminate himself in Iraq abuse cases

    • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/e23b2c8a5a7a4a05410f82a6104e445f/custom_thumbnail_large.png?h=250&fm=webp

      Warren Olney

      former KCRW broadcaster

      NewsNationalPolitics
    Back to To the Point