To the Point

Supreme Court Rejects Ban on Violent Games to Minors

The Constitution does not allow states to protect children by limiting the violence in video games or any other medium. That's according to the US Supreme Court in a 7-to-2 ruling today in a case from California. David Savage reports on the court for the Los Angeles Times .

By Warren Olney • May 12, 2014 • 1 min read

The Constitution does not allow states to protect children by limiting the violence in video games or any other medium. That's according to the US Supreme Court in a 7-to-2 ruling today in a case from California. David Savage reports on the court for the Los Angeles Times.

Warren Olney
former KCRW broadcaster
Darrell Satzman
Producer
Frances Anderton
architecture critic and author
David Savage
Supreme Court reporter for the Los Angeles Times

News

National

Politics

To the Point

Supreme Court Rejects Ban on Violent Games to Minors

The Constitution does not allow states to protect children by limiting the violence in video games or any other medium. That's according to the US Supreme Court in a 7-to-2 ruling today in a case from California. David Savage reports on the court for the Los Angeles Times .

Share

To the Point

Supreme Court Rejects Ban on Violent Games to Minors

The Constitution does not allow states to protect children by limiting the violence in video games or any other medium. That's according to the US Supreme Court in a 7-to-2 ruling today in a case from California. David Savage reports on the court for the Los Angeles Times .

Share