To the Point
The psychological impact of US torture
In the aftermath of September 11, during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, legal advisors in the George W. Bush Administration signed off on so-called "enhanced interrogation" techniques to gather intelligence. They argued that it wasn't "torture" because there would not be long-term physical or psychological damage.
By Warren Olney • • 1 min readIn the aftermath of September 11, during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, legal advisors in the George W. Bush Administration signed off on so-called "enhanced interrogation" techniques to gather intelligence. They argued that it wasn't "torture" because there would not be long-term physical or psychological damage. But nobody in the government has bothered to check to make sure that was true.
Now the New York Times has published the first in a series of reports, "How US Torture Left a Legacy of Damaged Minds." The author is investigative reporter James Risen.
The full episode
3 of 3
The political fallout from Trump's "grope and brag"- 1:53Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 is dead
- 8:47The political fallout from Trump's "grope and brag"
- 42:35The psychological impact of US tortureYou’re reading this
The full episode
3 of 3The political fallout from Trump's "grope and brag"- 1:53Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 is dead
- 8:47The political fallout from Trump's "grope and brag"
- 42:35The psychological impact of US tortureYou’re reading this