Listen Live
Donate
 on air
    Schedule

    KCRW

    Read & Explore

    • News
    • Entertainment
    • Food
    • Culture
    • Events

    Listen

    • Live Radio
    • Music
    • Podcasts
    • Full Schedule

    Information

    • About
    • Careers
    • Help / FAQ
    • Newsletters
    • Contact

    Support

    • Become a Member
    • Become a VIP
    • Ways to Give
    • Shop
    • Member Perks

    Become a Member

    Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

    DonateGive Monthly

    Copyright 2026 KCRW. All rights reserved.

    Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
    Cookie Policy
    |FCC Public Files|

    Back to Which Way, L.A.?

    Which Way, L.A.?

    Complicated Relationship of People and Their Pets

    Two San Francisco dog owners are on trial in LA for the mauling death of a neighbor. The trial was moved because emotions were too high for the trial to be held where the killing occurred. One defendant could become the first American ever found guilty of murder for the actions of a pet. The case raises important questions about the presence of animals in urban settings and who should be held responsible for the actions of those animals. We look at pets and their owners, their emotional ties and legal relationships with the founder of a national animal advocacy group, a veterinarian who treats behavioral problems, and the director of a Pennsylvania research center on the interaction of animals and society. Reporter-s Notebook: Mentally Retarded on Death Row The US Supreme Court based its 1989 refusal to ban the death penalty for the mentally retarded on a lack of a national consensus that such executions were wrong. Today, the court took up the issue again. Sara Catania, who's covering the case as part of a fellowship with the Open Society Institute, reports that the court will again consider the weight of national consensus, diminished capacity, and "cruel and unusual punishment."

    • rss
    • Share
    By Warren Olney • Feb 20, 2002 • 1 min read

    Two San Francisco dog owners are on trial in LA for the mauling death of a neighbor. The trial was moved because emotions were too high for the trial to be held where the killing occurred. One defendant could become the first American ever found guilty of murder for the actions of a pet. The case raises important questions about the presence of animals in urban settings and who should be held responsible for the actions of those animals. We look at pets and their owners, their emotional ties and legal relationships with the founder of a national animal advocacy group, a veterinarian who treats behavioral problems, and the director of a Pennsylvania research center on the interaction of animals and society.

    • Reporter-s Notebook:

      Mentally Retarded on Death Row

      The US Supreme Court based its 1989 refusal to ban the death penalty for the mentally retarded on a lack of a national consensus that such executions were wrong. Today, the court took up the issue again. Sara Catania, who's covering the case as part of a fellowship with the Open Society Institute, reports that the court will again consider the weight of national consensus, diminished capacity, and "cruel and unusual punishment."

    Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society

    The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour, and Interactions with People

    In Defense of Animals

    LA Weekly

    Open Society Institute

    • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

      Warren Olney

      former KCRW broadcaster

    • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

      Frances Anderton

      architecture critic and author

      News
    Back to Which Way, L.A.?