Listen Live
Donate
 on air
Schedule

KCRW

Read & Explore

  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Events

Listen

  • Live Radio
  • Music
  • Podcasts
  • Full Schedule

Information

  • About
  • Careers
  • Help / FAQ
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

Support

  • Become a Member
  • Become a VIP
  • Ways to Give
  • Shop
  • Member Perks

Become a Member

Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

DonateGive Monthly

Copyright 2026 KCRW. All rights reserved.

Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
Cookie Policy
|FCC Public Files

Back to Which Way, L.A.?

Which Way, L.A.?

The Death Penalty and the Scott Peterson Case

Jury decisions are supposed to be based on evidence, but in the San Francisco suburb of Redwood City, a jury recommended capital punishment for Scott Peterson, even though the case was entirely circumstantial. Nobody knows how his pregnant wife Laci was killed or what the motive might have been. Jurors say they voted for the death penalty because the convicted murderer showed no remorse or any emotion at all. With the national trend moving away from death sentences, why was Peterson's case different? Will it set a precedent for other cases? Should defendants take acting lessons? We hear several opinions from experts in criminal law, the death penalty, media and politics. (An extended version of this program was originally broadcast earlier today on To the Point.) Reporter-s Notebook: Pinochet to Stand Trial In 1990, General Augusto Pinochet gave up power to a civilian government, and retired as a senior statesman, with support from world figures. This week a Chilean judge ruled that the 89 year-old former dictator is mentally competent to stand trial for some of the thousands of killings and disappearances that took place while he was in power. UCLA Sociologist Maurice Zeitlin, author of many articles and two books on Chile, has more.

  • rss
  • Share
By Warren Olney • Dec 15, 2004 • 30m Listen

Jury decisions are supposed to be based on evidence, but in the San Francisco suburb of Redwood City, a jury recommended capital punishment for Scott Peterson, even though the case was entirely circumstantial. Nobody knows how his pregnant wife Laci was killed or what the motive might have been. Jurors say they voted for the death penalty because the convicted murderer showed no remorse or any emotion at all. With the national trend moving away from death sentences, why was Peterson's case different? Will it set a precedent for other cases? Should defendants take acting lessons? We hear several opinions from experts in criminal law, the death penalty, media and politics. (An extended version of this program was originally broadcast earlier today on To the Point.)

  • Reporter-s Notebook:

    Pinochet to Stand Trial

    In 1990, General Augusto Pinochet gave up power to a civilian government, and retired as a senior statesman, with support from world figures. This week a Chilean judge ruled that the 89 year-old former dictator is mentally competent to stand trial for some of the thousands of killings and disappearances that took place while he was in power. UCLA Sociologist Maurice Zeitlin, author of many articles and two books on Chile, has more.

Capital punishment statistics from the Justice Department

Augusto Pinochet, George Washington University archives on

Operation Condor

  • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

    Warren Olney

    former KCRW broadcaster

  • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

    Frances Anderton

    architecture critic and author

    News
Back to Which Way, L.A.?