Listen Live
Donate
 on air
    Schedule

    KCRW

    Read & Explore

    • News
    • Entertainment
    • Food
    • Culture
    • Events

    Listen

    • Live Radio
    • Music
    • Podcasts
    • Full Schedule

    Information

    • About
    • Careers
    • Help / FAQ
    • Newsletters
    • Contact

    Support

    • Become a Member
    • Become a VIP
    • Ways to Give
    • Shop
    • Member Perks

    Become a Member

    Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

    DonateGive Monthly

    Copyright 2026 KCRW. All rights reserved.

    Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
    Cookie Policy
    |FCC Public Files|

    Back to To the Point

    To the Point

    The Supreme Court Wraps Up Its Term

    Two key Supreme Court decisions  were made today. One allows closely held companies to opt out of the requirement of having to provide contraception coverage for employees under Obamacare; the other allows some public employees to avoid paying dues to the union representing them.

    • rss
    • Share
    KCRW placeholderBy Barbara Bogaev • Jun 30, 2014 • 1 min read

    Two key Supreme Court decisions were made today. One allows closely held companies to opt out of the requirement of having to provide contraception coverage for employees under Obamacare; the other allows some public employees to avoid paying dues to the union representing them.

    In a 5-4 decision today the court sided with the Hobby Lobby crafts stores and Conestoga Wood, a cabinet making company, in a contraceptive case. Both companies claimed their Christian beliefs compel them not to cover certain kinds of contraception mandated under Obamacare. The court ruled that so-called “closely held” companies such as these qualify could for an exemption under the healthcare law if it violated the owners’ religious beliefs.

    In the other big ruling this morning, the Court decided that unions cannot force home care workers to pay their dues. Many labor supporters and court watchers referred to Harris v. Quinn as the session’s sleeper case -- seemingly a dry challenge over the right of unions to demand dues, but lying just below the surface are implications that could affect the future of electoral politics, immigration reform, hiking the minimum wage, and other issues of vital national importance.

    The full episode

    2 of 3
    Conservative Victories at the Supreme Court
    1. 1:20Supreme Court Rules on Hobby Lobby Case
    2. 8:09The Supreme Court Wraps Up Its TermYou’re reading this
    3. 42:31Facebook Manipulates Your Feed and Your Emotional State
    • KCRW placeholder

      Barbara Bogaev

      radio journalist

    • KCRW placeholder

      Dahlia Lithwick

      Author; Senior legal affairs correspondent, Slate; podcast host, Amicus podcast

    • KCRW placeholder

      Ilya Shapiro

      Cato Institute

    • KCRW placeholder

      David Savage

      Supreme Court reporter for the Los Angeles Times

      NewsNationalPolitics

    The full episode

    2 of 3
    Conservative Victories at the Supreme Court
    1. 1:20Supreme Court Rules on Hobby Lobby Case
    2. 8:09The Supreme Court Wraps Up Its TermYou’re reading this
    3. 42:31Facebook Manipulates Your Feed and Your Emotional State
    Back to To the Point