Which Way, L.A.?
Healthcare Reform: Should Obama Have Fought for Single-Payer?
The US Supreme Court opened a new session today with an unexpected challenge. The Obama Justice Department has asked that it resolve differences between lower courts on the President’s controversial healthcare reform, specifically the mandate for all Americans to buy health insurance whether they want to or not.
By Warren Olney • • 1 min readThe US Supreme Court opened a new session today with an unexpected challenge. The Obama Justice Department has asked that it resolve differences between lower courts on the President’s controversial healthcare reform, specifically the mandate for all Americans to buy health insurance whether they want to or not. What could that mean for next year's elections? Is a "single payer" plan providing "universal coverage" still a live issue after all?
The full episode
3 of 3
What about Football in the City of Industry?- 0:00Report from Occupy LA
- 7:09What about Football in the City of Industry?
- 26:16Healthcare Reform: Should Obama Have Fought for Single-Payer?You’re reading this
Warren Olney
former KCRW broadcaster
Sonya Geis
Senior Managing Editor
Frances Anderton
architecture critic and author
Andrea Brody
Senior Producer, KCRW's Life Examined and To the Point podcast
Linda Feldman
Christian Science Monitor
Cathy Schoen
Commonwealth Fund
Avik Roy
Bipartisan Policy Center / Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity
The full episode
3 of 3What about Football in the City of Industry?- 0:00Report from Occupy LA
- 7:09What about Football in the City of Industry?
- 26:16Healthcare Reform: Should Obama Have Fought for Single-Payer?You’re reading this