Listen Live
Donate
 on air
Schedule

KCRW

Read & Explore

  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Events

Listen

  • Live Radio
  • Music
  • Podcasts
  • Full Schedule

Information

  • About
  • Careers
  • Help / FAQ
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

Support

  • Become a Member
  • Become a VIP
  • Ways to Give
  • Shop
  • Member Perks

Become a Member

Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

DonateGive Monthly

Copyright 2025 KCRW. All rights reserved.

Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
Cookie Policy
|FCC Public Files

Back to To the Point

To the Point

Should ‘Climate Change’ be ‘Climate Crisis?’

The biggest story of modern times is bad for audience ratings. To save money, news outlets are hiding the truth of environmental disaster.

  • rss
Download MP3
  • Share
By Warren Olney • May 27, 2019 • 31m Listen

Led by the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation and the Guardian, environmental journalists are accusing their own profession of being “complacent while the world burns.” They say wildfires, floods and other disasters are too often reported without reference to what science says they mean for the future. Both “happy talk news” on local TV and major newspapers are driven by “the brutal demands of ratings and money.” Instead of “sleepwalking us toward disaster,” they need to awaken, inform, and rouse the people to action.”

  • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

    Warren Olney

    former KCRW broadcaster

  • KCRW placeholder

    Andrea Brody

    Senior Producer, KCRW's Life Examined and To the Point podcast

  • KCRW placeholder

    Oliver Milman

    Environmental reporter for the Guardian

  • KCRW placeholder

    Mark Hertsgaard

    Nation magazine

    NewsNationalPolitics
Back to To the Point