Listen Live
Donate
 on air
    Schedule

    KCRW

    Read & Explore

    • News
    • Entertainment
    • Food
    • Culture
    • Events

    Listen

    • Live Radio
    • Music
    • Podcasts
    • Full Schedule

    Information

    • About
    • Careers
    • Help / FAQ
    • Newsletters
    • Contact

    Support

    • Become a Member
    • Become a VIP
    • Ways to Give
    • Shop
    • Member Perks

    Become a Member

    Donate to KCRW to support this cultural hub for music discovery, in-depth journalism, community storytelling, and free events. You'll become a KCRW Member and get a year of exclusive benefits.

    DonateGive Monthly

    Copyright 2026 KCRW. All rights reserved.

    Report a Bug|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|
    Cookie Policy
    |FCC Public Files|

    Back to To the Point

    To the Point

    Trump reverses Obama on climate change

    President Trump is finally fulfilling his campaign pledge to undo the Obama Clean Power Plan. It’s supposedly a boost for “Clean Coal,” but Wall Street is skeptical and environmentalists are outraged.

    • rss
    Download MP3
    • Share
    By Warren Olney • Jun 29, 2019 • 34m Listen

    President Trump’s Affordable Clean Energy rule is “the most significant environmental rollback in U.S. history,” says Barack Obama’s White House counsel on the environment, Jody Freeman.

    With environmentalists and several state attorneys general already headed for court, Freeman says, “all these reversals and all of this litigation means it’s just lost time, lost opportunity, to get on track with a climate agenda. Climate policy is being made right now by the executive branch and the courts. But Congress is missing in action.”

    The rollback was announced by Andrew Wheeler, Trump’s EPA chief, who is a former coal industry lobbyist. He says it’s a much-needed boost for so-called “clean coal.”

    Michael Gerrard of the Sabin Center for Climate Change says that’s not realistic. “Somebody who is thinking about, do they want to invest a lot of money in making a coal-fueled power plant a little less dirty? Are they going to invest a couple hundred million dollars to do that, if they know that in a year and a half, we may have another president who is going to work very hard to shut it down?”

    However, a future president might not find things all that easy. The EPA and other agencies are firing experienced regulators and muzzling scientists. Freeman says,

    “One of the most dangerous things I think this administration has done is actually erode the capacity of the United States government.”

    And this comes at a time when the magnitude of the climate change challenge is daunting. “It’s almost impossible to imagine big enough steps at this moment,” she says, “We have to be really ambitious about it. We need the administration to be committed to reducing our emissions and to go back to the international context, back to the Paris Agreement and say, ‘we’re in.’”

    Gerrard concedes it will be massively disruptive and costly to deal with climate change but, “expensive as that is, it will be much cheaper than not doing it.” And, he adds, America has done it before. “After Pearl Harbour we did it. We can do that again but we need a national consensus.”

    • https://images.ctfassets.net/2658fe8gbo8o/AvYox6VuEgcxpd20Xo9d3/769bca4fbf97bf022190f4813812c1e2/new-default.jpg?h=250

      Warren Olney

      former KCRW broadcaster

    • KCRW placeholder

      Andrea Brody

      Senior Producer, KCRW's Life Examined and To the Point podcast

    • KCRW placeholder

      Jody Freeman

      Professor of Law, director of Harvard Law School’s Environmental Law Program

    • KCRW placeholder

      Michael Gerrard

      Columbia Law School

      NewsEnvironmentPoliticsNational
    Back to To the Point