ON AIR
00:00:00 | 3:02:50

DONATE!

close

FROM THIS EPISODE

Uber is pulling its application to renew its permit for testing autonomous vehicles cars on California streets.

But the California DMV plans to still move forward with issuing driverless testing and/or deployment permits beginning April 2. But, a spokesman said, “that doesn’t mean a manufacturer will meet the requirements or if we will approve them.” So even if Uber had applied, it's unlikely it would receive a permit.

Companies are already testing self-driving cars on California roads today, such as General Motors, Google’s self-driving spinoff Waymo, and a startup called Zoox. But those all have humans inside. This next phase will allow for testing without humans inside the cars, but there’ll be a remote operator ready to take over.

Uber says it withdrew its California application because it wouldn’t have been able to respond to state regulators’ questions until it first reviewed the findings of the investigation in Arizona. So far no one has determined whether Uber was at fault in the crash.

But the reason Uber was test-driving cars in Arizona was because it had started testing its self-driving cars in San Francisco in December 2016, even though the DMV ordered the company to obtain a permit. Uber refused, the DMV revoked Uber’s self-driving car licenses, and the company moved its testing operation to Tempe.

In the wake of this fatal crash, people have criticized Arizona for overly lax regulations of self-driving cars.

California's regulations will allow a true driverless car to operate on public roads in a "safe controlled manner," meaning cars will be able to be tested without a human in them. Prior to these rules, autonomous vehicles could only be tested in California with an approved driver.

Under the new regulations, vehicle manufacturers must obtain a driverless testing permit from the DMV and comply with the permit requirements, which include:

  • A required communication link between the vehicle and the remote operator, and between the vehicle and law enforcement.
  • Evidence the vehicle is equipped with an autonomous vehicle data recorder, to detect and respond to roadway situations in compliance with California Vehicle Code,
  • And the vehicle has to meet current industry standards to help defend against, detect and respond to cyber-attacks, unauthorized intrusions or false vehicle control commands.


People seem to be divided on the autonomous car future. On the one hand, many people are looking forward to not having to pay attention to the road, and to fewer traffic fatalities. Imagine a world without drunk driving.

But the Tempe crash shows that the technology has a long way to go.

There’s another concern you’ll hear, related to induced demand. The utopian view of autonomous cars is that they will relieve traffic, by reducing car ownership and the need for so much parking.

But the less optimistic view is that the opposite will happen. This view anticipates more vehicles miles traveled (VMT), because autonomous vehicles will make car rides so much more convenient, further clogging America’s already congested city streets. Plus they don’t believe people will give up on car ownership.

You only have to look at what’s happened with Uber and Lyft. Ride-hailing was heralded as a means to get people out of their cars, but there are now more on the roads.

Experts also caution that without sound public policy, the autonomous future could be more polluted.

"If the autonomous future is imminent, how do we make sure it's shared and electric at the same time?," asked Matt Petersen, CEO of the L.A. Cleantech Incubator and former chief sustainability officer for the City of Los Angeles. "So we don't just end up with more vehicles on the road that have internal combustion engines, or for that matter autonomous shared vehicles that have internal combustion engines. We really need to reduce emissions from an air quality standpoint, and a greenhouse gas emissions standpoint, here in Southern California."

Here’s the reality: A recent California Traffic Survey reported texting while driving and the use of mobile phones as “the most serious distractions on roadways today.”

But pedestrians are distracted too. How many times have you been driving or biking and a person walks into the street while texting or listening to music and does not stop at the street edge to look out for traffic? Honolulu now fines distracted walkers, and the small Southern California city of Montclair has introduced $100 fines for people crossing the street while staring at their phones.

Now that smartphones have turned us into distracted drivers and distracted pedestrians, the argument goes, autonomous cars are necessary.


An Uber self-driving car. Photo credit: zombieite via Flickr/CC.

Subscribe to the DnA newsletter

Exploring ideas big or small, local or international, with a look at their impact on our daily lives.

 

More From Design and Architecture

LATEST BLOG POSTS

Latest From KCRW

View Schedule

Events

View All Events

iTUNES SPOTIFY
AMAZON RDIO
FACEBOOK TWITTER

Player Embed Code

COPY EMBED